AI safety allocation · compiled 26 September 2026
Where AI safety's people, money and compute go
01
Same field, five very different shapes
02
03
04
05
06
What the nine categories mean
07
Evidence, confidence and method
Confidence grades
C1Direct primary source, counted by us (e.g. mentor lists, grant databases, 990 lines).
C2Primary source but partial or sampled, or a credible secondary source reporting the number.
C3Inferred from real data with the working shown.
C4Weakly grounded: few examples, or heavy modelling assumptions.
C5Essentially a guess, shown so the structure is visible.
A headline takes the grade of its weakest load-bearing input. Intervals are 80% ranges. They combine source noise with a model of classification ambiguity: on recheck, about 10% of items were firmly miscategorised and 20–35% were genuinely ambiguous. For compute they also include shared errors: annualising a one-week measurement, other labs' unknown safety shares, and scope.
Load-bearing claims, rechecked
Each was re-fetched from its source by an independent verifier. Filter by grade or by check result.
Caveats